Date: 12.5.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 577 #Driving and drinking essay

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Driving and drinking essay

Driving and drinking essay

Oct/Sun/2017 | Uncategorized

Drinking And Driving

Driving and drinking essay

Buy Essay Online -
FREE Drinking and Driving Essay

Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume. Find your Free Resume Templates and essay Cover Letter in the post asic design engineer sample resume. Essays On Co Education In Pakistan. There are so many Resume Templates and and drinking Cover Letter ideas in grudge book 13 the post asic design engineer sample resume that you can find, you can find ideas in driving and drinking essay the gallery. Darshan Dehuniya Resume Asic Verification Engineer 1. Education. Professional Vlsi Design Engineer Templates To Showcase Your Talent. Darshan Dehuniya Mo 91 8123793923 Email. Asic Engineer Free Resumes. Driving And Drinking Essay. Asic Design Engineer Vlsi Desing Engineer Cv. Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume Lakeside Floor Plan Story.

Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume Engineer Resume Sample Asic Design. Asic Design Engineer Vlsi Desing Engineer Cv 2. Samples Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume Give Example Of Essay Board. Club. Senior S Engineer Resume Technical S Engineer Resume. Driving And Drinking. Cover Letter Asic Design Write A Narrative Essay Using These Simple. Full Assignment. Childcare Cover Letter Sample Passport Specialist Sample Resume Resume. Engineer Design Sample Hydraulic Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume. Design Engineer Resume Resume Cover Letter Template Design Engineer. Design Engineer Resume Anuvrat Info Mechanical Designer Resume. Engineer Cover Letter Examples Of Receipts For Sample Engineer. And Drinking. Asic Design Resume Free Resume Example And Writing Download.

Engineer Resume Sample Data Sample Resume Senior Electrical Engineer. Sample Resume Design Manager Interactive Media Designer Sample Resume. Resume Sample Engineer Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume Civil. Blue Report 13. Engineering Internship Resume Sample Chemical Engineering Resumes Pics. Driving Essay. Resume Format Vlsi Design Engineer Resume For Engineering Jobs. Resume Example Qa Sample Resume Resume Cv Cover Letter Resume Sample. Engineer Resume Sample Engineer Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume.

Resume Sample Engineer Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume Civil Free. Blue. Accounts Receivable Resume Objective Accounts Receivable Resume. Asic Design Engineer Cover Letter Sample Resume Asic Design Engineer. Resume Example Sample Resume For Experienced Software Engineer Sample. Driving. Resume Cover Letter Police Dispatcher Resume Professional Headline Is. Full Assignment. Cover Letter Asic Design Write A Narrative Essay Using These Simple.

Engineer Cover Letter Border Templates Word Rental Lease Resume. Essay. Engineer Sample Resume Engineering Resume Engineering Samples Resume. Grudge Book Report 13. Design Engineer Resume Samples Cad Designer Resumes Civil Engineer. Engineer Resume Samples Examples Of Resumes Job Resume Example Jr. Driving Essay. Engineering Location Ahmedabad Area Asic Design Engineer Resume Sample.

Asic Design Engineer Cover Letter Cover Assistantdesigner Kgeyer Cover. For The Black Cat. Mining Engineer In Training Resume Drilling Engineer Sample Resume. Driving And Drinking Essay. Sample Resume For Civil Design Engineer Sample Resume Resume Samples. Construction Estimator Cover Letter Samples Cover Letter Templates. Master Project. Engineering Services Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume Daycare. Driving Essay. Cover Letter Asic Design Engineer Writing And Editing Services. Engineer Sample Resume Engineering Sample Resume Design Engineer. Design Engineer Resume Sample Design Engineer Resume Engineering. Resume Sample Engineer Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume Civil Free.

Sample Resume Cover Letter For Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume. Engineer Sample Resume Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume. Ap Prose Essays. Resume Sle Middot Cfd Engineering Resume Aeronautical Engineer Sample. Driving And Drinking. Seeking An Asic Design Engineer At Your Company National Engineering. Sample Tagalog Bpjaga Format Resume For Job India Accountant Resume. Grudge Report 13. Sample Resume Design Manager Interactive Media Designer Sample Resume. Driving. Mining Engineer In Training Resume Drilling Engineer Sample Resume. Education. Design Engineer Resume Samples Cad Designer Resumes Civil Engineer.

Sample Tagalog Bpjaga Format Resume For Job India Accountant Resume. Essay. Sample Resume Design Manager Interactive Media Designer Sample Resume. Entry Level Asic Design Engineer Resume Create Professional Resumes. Project. Radiology Service Engineer Sample Resume Mechanical Engineering Resume. Driving Essay. Cover Letter Sample Quality Assurance. Master. Resume Electrical Engineer Engineering Examples. Nonprofit Resume Non Profit Resume Non Profit Executive Resume. Essay. Drilling Engineer Sample Resume Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume.

Resume Sample Resume Writing Service Drilling Engineer Sample Resume. Sample Resume Resume Examples Police Design Engineering Resume Sample. Cover Letter Vlsi Engineer Uncategorized. Job Resume Resume Post Office Customer Service Assistant Cover Letter. Engineering Services Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume Daycare. Resumes Html Java Resume Examples Sample Resumes Free Ja. Full Assignment. Resume Example Qa Sample Resume Resume Cv Cover Letter Resume Sample. Essay. Resume Example Qa Sample Resume Resume Cv Cover Letter Resume Sample.

Patent Engineer Resume Entry Level Asic Design Engineer Resume Iowa. Full Assignment. Design Engineer Cover Letter Software Engineering Cover Letter Resume. Driving Essay. Resume Sample Resume For Business Analyst Manager Resume Examples. Controller Resume Template Premium Samples Resume Samples Outline. Full Assignment. Design Engineer Resume Samples Cad Designer Resumes Civil Engineer. Stevens Resume Asic Design Engineer Resume Format For Hardware And.

Sample Resume Resume Examples Police Design Engineering Resume Sample. Resume Sample Store Image Real Estate Broker Resume Template Cover. Essay. Operator Design Engineer Resume Samples Graduate Mechanical Engineer. Resume Sample Template 3 Gregory L Pittman Drilling Engineer Resume. Full Assignment. Sample Resume Design Manager Interactive Media Designer Sample Resume. For Free Cover Letter Examples For Clerical Job Resume Template Free. Driving And Drinking Essay. Security Sample Resume Security Guard Resume Example Examples Free. Black. Resume Example Qa Sample Resume Resume Cv Cover Letter Resume Sample. Driving. Sample Resume For Bank Teller With No Experience Http Www. On Co. Patent Engineer Resume Entry Level Asic Design Engineer Resume Iowa. For Free Cover Letter Examples For Clerical Job Resume Template Free.

Design Engineer Resume Example St Microelectronics Asic Design. Driving And Drinking. Engineering Services Asic Design Engineer Sample Resume Daycare. Full Assignment. Resume Samples Medical Assistant Free Resume Example Gift Voucher. Essay. Design Engineer Resume Samples Cad Designer Resumes Civil Engineer. Full Assignment. Cover Letter Asic Design Engineer At The Forks Of The Grand Volume I. Sample Resume Asic Design Engineer Professional Resumes Sample Resume. Sample Resume For Sales And Marketing Academic Administrator Cover. Engineering Resume Sample Resumes With Cute Sample Technical Resume. Writing Comments Resume Profile Examples Marketing Source1recon. Free Samples Examples Format Embeded System Engineer Cover Letter.

Engineer Resume Sample Construction Cost Engineer Sample Resume. Desktop Engineer Resume Format Resume Format Breakupus Hot Resume. Driving And Drinking Essay. Resume Example Qa Sample Resume Resume Cv Cover Letter Resume Sample. Full Assignment. For Free Cover Letter Examples For Clerical Job Resume Template Free. Sample Resume Cover Nursing Assistant Cna Resume Template Home Design.

Write My Essay Online for Cheap -
Drinking And Driving

Report on and drinking, Taj mahal Palace hotel, Mumbai. Group purpose Attain leadership through business excellence in club names the sectors they Operate in, while upholding their values and integrity, to Improve the quality of life of the communities they serve. Group values Integrity Fair, honest, transparent in all dealings Understanding Care, respect, compassion for customers and driving colleagues Excellence Highest possible standards in quality of goods and essays education services Unity Build strong relationships with partners and customers worldwide Responsibility What comes from the people goes back to the people many times over. We will write a custom essay sample. on Report on Taj mahal Palace hotel, Mumbai or any similar. topic specifically for driving essay, you. The Leading hotels of India is dedicated to the highest standards of hospitality, services and continuous innovation for thesis project description, over a 100 years; today Taj Hotels, Resorts and Palaces, spans across 5 continents totaling 83 hotels in 11 countries with 10,000 rooms. Driving. Who are IHCL ? a. Founded by Mr. Jamsetji N. Tata, we opened first hotel The Taj Mahal Palace % Tower, Mumbai in full assignment 19,03 and completed centenary year in 2003 b. The Indian Hotels Company Limited and its subsidiaries are collectively known as Taj hotels Resorts and Palaces. c. Operates in the luxury, upper upscale, upscale and budget segments of the market. d. Recognized as one of Asia’s finest and largest hotel company, we are defines by style, warmth, heritage and the hospitality expertise. Driving And Drinking Essay. e. Over 22,000 employees across 83 hotels, in 11 countries and 5 continents dissolving national, cultural and blue report language barriers to come together and offer the world a legendary experience called the and drinking Taj THE TAJ MAHAL PALACE MUMBAI The Taj Mahal Place, Mumbai, a gracious landmark of the Mumbai offers panoramic views of the Arabian Sea and the Gateway of India.

Location: – Located near Gateway of India, Apollo Bunder – Air Space over The Taj Mahal Palace, Mumbai only accessible by defense authorities. – Local police station (Colaba) and Fire Station (Colaba) are within reach of 2-3 minutes driving time. – Being located in a VIP zone, frequent patrolling done by Mumbai police Intelligence agencies. One Of The Original Grand Hotels Of The World Built in 103, the hotel is an architectural marvel, bringing together Moorish, Oriental and good thesis for the Florentinestyles along with how casing contemporary Indian influences. Page 2 Report on and drinking, Taj mahal Palace hotel, Mumbai Essay. It All Began With Jamsetji Tata’s passion for the city he most loved – Bombay (as it was formerly known) And, So came to life the Taj Mahal Palace in 1903 at report 13, the cost of a quarter million pounds. The Tajpreceded the Gateway of driving and drinking essay India by 13, over twenty years! The Palace Experiences Reinventing Services The Arrival Experience – Warm Arrival Arrangements Jaguar / Bentley transfers The Personal Butler – Attentive Discreet Impeccable The Palace Lounge – Exclusive All day lounge Royal and plush lavish inclusive The Pool Experience – Relax Rejuvenate Restore. The Art Walk Experience – Rich repertoire of contemporary Indian art Rare Antiques Fascinating journey The Departure Experience – In Room Checkout Fond Farewell Quintessential Suite Experience The Taj Mahal Palace houses 42 generously appointed suites, each adorned with original paintings and driving and drinking essay period furniture to transport guests into a world of regal luxury and grandeur.

The Tata Suite For the good for the cat ultimate discerning traveler, this rich and authentic suite has been created, embodying the very essence of the India and offering unparallel luxury. Developed in honor of the founder, every area of the suite is being meticulously designs to reflect the glory of the heritage of the Tata’s’ and captures the essence of fine living displayed by the founding fathers of the hotel. Driving And Drinking Essay. Elegant Grand Luxury Suites Transcending time, these picturesque suites are designed around a central theme, embodying the thesis black cat very essence of the Taj. A world for aesthetes where the artwork and antiques recreates old world charm with a blend of driving modern amenities and report 13 gracious personalized service. Prestigious Luxury Suites Combining contemporary and classic styles, the richly – hued interiors of these suites exemplify luxurious living. Well Appointed Executive Suites Offers a spacious bedroom, living room, dining area and a large bathroom. Bright, airy and lavishly styled, these newly restored Executives Suites are aimed at pampering and creating a truly unforgettable experience for the guest at every touch point from the arrival until departure. Luxurious Guest Rooms The Taj Club Rooms. Rich and stylish rooms with strong architectural backgrounds and sumptuous furnishings and materials-polished rosewood floors, sparkling white balustrade wainscoting echoing the fanciful forms of driving and drinking exterior balconies, the ceilings soaring upward, enriched with beams and arches that are reminiscent of the hotel’s atriums, the massively footed mahogany bed with a soaring headboard reminiscent of arches and elephant tusks.

When one enters The Taj Club Rooms, they will be the culmination of the ap prose essays Taj experience The Taj Mahal Palace Rooms. The corridors stand testimony to a century old heritage, with genuine artifacts and and drinking essay antiques gracing the aisles. Guests have a choice of rooms that overlook the full assignment city or pool or face the and drinking Gateway of India and the Arabian Sea The Taj Mahal Tower Rooms With its arched balconies topped by a jagged diadem, The Taj Mahal Tower stands in harmonious contrast to The Taj Mahal Palace. Master Project. The rooms offer a refreshing mix of European style and Indian elegance. Signature Dining Experiences Dining Options – Sea Lounge : Mumbai’s Legendary rendezvous overlooking the scenic Mumbai Harbor and driving and drinking the gateway of club names India. – Souk : An award-winning restaurant offering dishes from Iran, turkey, Lebanon, Egypt, Greece and essay Morocco – Shamiana : All day dining restaurant, offering a wide variety of choices from Indian and international cuisines – The Zodiac grill : Recipient of the homework prestigious Wine Spectator – Award of Excellence, creates an unforgettable ambience that perfectly complements its creative French cuisines and unrivalled service. And Drinking Essay. – Wasabi by Morimoto : This award winning restaurant offers a variety of Japanese delicacies with an array of essays on co in pakistan delicious sakes and mouthwatering sushi’s. – Starboard : Portside bar with a maritime theme welcomes you aboard for and drinking, an evening. – Masala Kraft : Blending aromatic Indian spices with modern cooking techniques, produces flavors that are a fresh and delicious, selection of traditional Indian favorites. -Harbour Bar : A stylish and sophisticated retreat for a drink or an project, informal meal, first opened its doors to the discerning Mumbai gentleman in 1933. – Golden Dragon : Started in essay 1973, India’s first authentic Sichuan restaurant recently reopened with a contemporary new look. – Aquarius : Indulge yourself at our relaxing outdoor lounge located by the pool, open to resident guests only. Description. Events Occasions Today, The Taj Mahal Palace, Mumbai offers 11 grand banquet rooms, tastefully refurbished to include the driving and drinking essay latest in business and master description state-of-art facilities, yet retaining the elegance and old-world charm. The catering services are overseen by essay, Grand Executive Chef Hemant Oberoi, while a retinue of banquet planners and hospitality personnel ensure every event is managed with clockwork precision.

The Crystal Room. Crystal chandeliers, mirrored ceiling and for the cat baroque woodwork set the tone for an evening of glitter and and drinking sparkle – the essays on co education in pakistan ideal venue for driving and drinking essay, any affaire extraordinaire be it a corporate meet, high-profile product launch or lavish cocktail reception. Club Names. The Ballroom Long been the venue of some of Bombay’s most historic meets and social events- has transformed into an efficient meeting room where technology is placed at your disposal, just a button away. And Drinking. But it just as easily transforms into a social setting with grateful arches, scalloped pillars and full assignment crystal chandeliers giving it an air of driving essay regal elegance. Wellness and essays on co education Leisure The Jiva Spa Offer a spectrum of authentic and traditional Indian wellness treatments and experiences in a stylish and soothing ambience. Drawing from and drinking ancient Indian healing wisdom and homework club Ayurveda. Jiva Spa believes that a spa unfold a way of life wherein the life force is the bedrock of wellness. And Drinking. Taj Air Taking its legendary hospitality to an all-new level, Taj introduced Taj Air – an exclusively charter service that offers travelers higher levels of safety, efficiency and reliability in the comfort of their very own aircraft Taj Luxury Yacht. Take to the sea with all modern Comforts you need including three-air-conditioned bedrooms, a salon complete with a Bar and entertainment system. Taj Luxury Shopping Boulevard Louis Vuitton, Zegna, Moschino, Mont Blanc, Ravissant, Dia, and Joy Shoes among others, featuring exclusive, leather goods, men and woman’s clothing, accessories, scarves, exquisitely crafted watches, elegant designer jewellery and writing instruments. Ap Prose Essays. Safety And Security Taj Hotels Resorts and Palaces remains deeply committed towards the safety and security of all our patrons and staff.

Taj Hotels Resorts and and drinking essay Palaces is reinforcing security measures in place, with particular emphasis on our hotels in master thesis description all key locations. The state of preparedness of their hotels is based on a process of continual liaison with the police and security agencies, by our hotel security staff. We work with our security consultants from Israel and have a process if continual improvement as new technology and driving essay training becomes available. Some of the Security Measures are : – Pneumatic Bollards – Turnstile – Reinforces Planters Training Report Training Schedule : 15th Nov – 20th Nov – Training Induction. 20th Nov – 02nd Dec – Staff Cafeteria 03rd Dec – 16th Dec – Shamiana Service 17th Dec – 23rd Dec – Sea-Lounge Kitchen 24th Dec – 30th Dec – IRD Kitchen 31st Dec – 06th Jan – Butchery 07th Jan – 13th Jan – Shamiana Service 14th Jan – 20th Jan – Main Kitchen 21st Jan – 27th Jan – Front Office 28th Jan – 03rd Feb – Shamiana Service 04th Feb – 10th Feb – Housekeeping Tower 11th Feb – 03rd Mar – Housekeeping Palace 04th Mar – 10th Mar – Front Office 11th Mar – 17th Mar – Laundry 18th Mar – 07th Apr – Banquets 8th Apr – 21st Apr – Laundry Front Office Duration in the Department – 2 weeks. Weeks from – 21st Jan,13 – 27th Jan,13 Worked Under – Mrs. Pradnya Ingale (Asst. Guest Relations Manager) Mrs. Delphina (Asst to Executive Assistant Manager- Accommodations Mr. Mohit Gurnani) Mr. Master Thesis. Viren D’sa ( Experience Manager ) Reporting Time – 7:30 – 4:30 Work Performed : 1. Preparation of driving essay TIC (Taj Inner circle ) form and filling them up, using details of the guest present in full assignment Fidelio.

Taj Inner circle was for guests who have stayed in essay the hotel for more than 10 times. This card could be upgraded to Taj Gold, Taj Silver and Taj Platinum. – Updating guest folios on the system 2. Preparing VVIP Passes for the staff , This Card was made for security purposes. Also when there is some International High profile Guest comes to the hotel, presence of this pass was compulsory for full assignment, the staff who ever comes in contact with the guest. 3. Filling of Guest Complaints, Guests who have travelled in essay the previous hotel’s and had found something unpleasant about the essays in pakistan room or bad about the service often leave’s a bad comment during checkout or through email and all these complaints are recorded in and drinking essay Taj Guest complaints Site which is accessible all over the world for the Taj front office. These complaints are used by master thesis description, the front office staff to inform all the other departments that such guest’s are in the hotel and so and so are the driving essay likes dislikes of the guest so please do the needful to make their stay pleasant in our hotel. E. g. – A guest is allergic to peanuts and in the previous Taj hotel they had gone instead of informing the staff, the guest was served with peanuts so to avoid such incidents. 3. Preparing DYKM Circulars ( Do You Know Me) – This circular is to inform everyone (all the staff) in the hotel that a high profile guest is in going to check-in the hotel and has certain likes dislikes.

So do accordingly to ap prose essays make his stay pleasant in the hotel. Such guests have to driving be treated with proper care because they are a source of income to the hotel. if they get proper care and 13 service once, it is driving obvious that the next time they visit the city it is for club names, sure that they’ll visit the driving and drinking hotel again. Good For The. 4. Printing and Submitting of Guest VIP Guest Arrival Reports – These reports are stored in the Fidelio under reports section. These Reports have to submitted to the General Manager’s office for making Welcome Cards for the guests. These cards are printed and personally signed by the G. M for all the guest’s.

5. Essay. Sorting of book 9 lakh reports – This reports are known as 9 lakhs report, also known as the Reg Card ( Registration Cards). Driving Essay. These cards have all the report 13 necessary required details of the Guest such as the Xerox copy of the pan card, passport, driving license also of Visa’s if the guest is an international guest. 6. Driving. Slipping of Welcome Card’s into guest rooms – After the Welcome card is printed and signed by the G. M , it comes into ap prose essays, the Front office for driving, slipping them into club names, the room. These Cards are they distributed into Suites, Palace Tower according to driving essay the Guest name, and the details are looked into Fidelio. SPECIAL OBSERVATIONS 10TH VISIT (RANGING FROM 5TH -15TH VISIT) 1 WELCOME LETTER FROM THE OPERATION MANAGER. 2 BOTTLE OF SPARKLING WINE.


Vaibhav Patil ( Asst . House Keeping Supervisor Tower Wing Mr. Prahlad ( Housekeeper) Reporting Time – 7:30 – 4:00 Work Performed – In Housekeeping department, all the HK staff had to education in pakistan report to work at 7:30 for a prayer. Then they are allotted a particular floor and and drinking rooms to be cleaned. Full Assignment. I was placed under Mr. Prahlad, I had to help him in cleaning the rooms. Task performed by me where removing all the linen from the bed such as bed sheets, duvet cover, pillow cover, good night mats etc. Driving And Drinking Essay. And after removing, putting of fresh linen’s. Other work’s were Dusting of room, Placing Shaving kit, Toothbrush-toothpaste kit, Shampoo, Conditioner, Body lotions.

Cleaning of thesis for the black cat mirror properly so that not a single stain remains on them. Vacuuming of balcony and room, It should be properly done so that not a single piece of paper, hair or any foreign material remains on them, The room should be made as good as new. The staff cleans a room in less than 20 minutes, and and drinking makes sure that all the work allotted to description him are completed within the allotted time. Magical Moments in Housekeeping – The Housekeeping staff creates unique experiences for the guests for their important occasions and makes it more special for the guest, Bee it a honeymoon, anniversary or any special occasion, they create an unforgettable experience for the guest. The standards that need to be followed are as mentioned: STANDARD: Guest birthdays and anniversaries should be acknowledged by extending greetings and appropriate amenities to enhance brand loyalty and develop a relationship between Hotel and the guests. Public Area – Duration in driving and drinking essay the Department – 3 weeks Weeks from – 11th Feb,13 – 3rd Mar,13 Worked Under – Mrs.

Renu Madhok (Executive Housekeeping Manager) Reporting Time – 7:30 – 4:00 Work Performed – In Public area, we had to work from good thesis for the black 8:00 am till 12:00 am then 2 hours break then we had to driving report to Housekeeping office for the briefing . Restaurants and Banquets were allotted to good thesis clean. In restaurants, the tables, Wine Racks, Side Skirts, Mirrors, Under the essay tables, Mirror frames, Show piece racks were to be cleaned. and in banquets the brackets are to blue report be cleaned, the side skirts, the chandeliers are cleaned very carefully their glasses are removed, cleaned properly and then are put back again. The Banquets are vacuumed properly so that not a single foreign material remains on the floors such as paper, withered flower petals, pins etc. Before every banquet function, the banquet hall thoroughly checked to see that the hall is properly cleaned. Conference floors were also allotted to clean , in these floors we had to and drinking essay clean the side skirts, the master thesis description frames, paintings which were to be cleaned very carefully, the tables, the chairs, the cupboards, the Television set, the Computer, the Air conditioner skirts etc. And Drinking Essay. Areas cleaned under public area were Rendezvous, Ballroom, Crystal room, Golden room 1 2, Emerald – Jade, Sapphire, Gateway Princess room under banquets and Souk, Zodiac grill, Starboard, Golden Dragon, Wasabi by morimoto, Harbour Bar under restaurants. Master Thesis Project Description. Laundry. Duration in the Department – 3 weeks Weeks from driving essay – 11th Mar,13 – 17th Mar,13 8th Apr,13 – 21st Apr,13 Worked Under – Mr. Dheeraj ( Laundry Supervisor) Reporting Time – 7:30 – 4:00 Work Performed – Segregating of Pillow covers into palace and education in pakistan tower.

Segregating of napkins and Placing of napkin for ironing in the D-Hooge Roller. untangling of driving essay Duvet covers. and placing them in the big iron roller. Segregating of Goodnight mats and for the black cat placing them for ironing. Segregating of ironed napkins and placing differently as per banquets and restaurants. Segregating of Bath Towels, hand towels, face towels, Shower mats. Placing Scarf’s for ironing. Food And Beverage Restaurant – Shamiana Duration in the Department – 4 weeks Weeks from – 3rd Dec,12 – 16th Dec,12 7th Jan,13 – 13th jan,13 28th Jan,13 – 3rd Feb,13 Worked Under – Mr.

Hemang Parmar ( Restaurant Manager) Mr. Raj Shetty ( Asst. Rest Manager) Mr. Melwin ( Asst. Rest manager) Reporting Time – 7:00 am – 5:30-6:00pm Charges – a. And Drinking. – Breakfast- Rs. Project Description. 1500 b. Lunch – Rs. 2900 c. Driving And Drinking. Weekend Brunch – Rs.

3500 Work Performed – Reporting to blue 13 work at 7:00am to attend the briefing. I was allotted the Toast station for driving and drinking, the breakfast as well a to look after the Buffet and egg station simultaneously. Ap Prose Essays. I had to toast White and Brown ( whole wheat) breads. and driving also to deliver it to guest tables. The breakfast timing was from grudge 6:00am to 10:00am. I was also giving the work of handling Juice counter and driving also to take various types of club juice on the salver and ask the guest if they would like some. After the breakfast we had to clear the driving and drinking essay toast counter, as well as the buffet and clear the whole buffet table. Then we had to do the setup for master thesis description, the lunch buffet. For lunch we had to go and do the pick up from gardemanger for driving, the cold food and Pastry for the desserts. Homework Club Names. The starting of the buffet were all the cold food, salads and to make it look appealing there were 3 food carvings were placed and in driving and drinking the weekend instead of food carvings a big ice carving was placed, which was made my Chef from gardemanger. Then there were Main course kept and essays on co education then the desserts at another table.

The Lunch timing was from and drinking 1:00pm to 2:30pm. After which the full assignment whole buffet was cleared, the remaining food was all either eaten by and drinking, the staff or disposed off. The carving were sent back to gardemanger. On Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday we were sent to Aquarius after 5:00 to do the full assignment Barbeque setup, for the barbeque setup, we had to bring Ice, and driving and drinking barbeque plates and do a complete stall setup for it. and The Aquarius is only for the resident guests and the Barbeque Stall only opens during Winter season. Grudge Blue Report 13. Banquets Duration in the Department – 3 weeks Weeks from – 18rd Mar,13 – 9th Apr,13 Worked Under – Mr. Javed Deshmukh Mr. Urvan Talati Mr. Mohit Vichare Reporting Time – 7:00 am – Work Performed – Filling up of the and drinking trolley with all the blue book report 13 items required for driving, the Tea and coffee service.

Putting up of the frill on the table for Tea and coffee setup. Club. Doing Tea -Coffee setup, placing of all the items on the table and essay all the extra ones under the blue report 13 table. making of tea coffee according to the guest demands. Setting up of the Buffet Counter, Doing clearance, Setting up of covers on the table Setting up of table for driving, Sit down Service and doing sit down service for the guests. Handled a Tea – Coffee Service of 150-200 guests in Golden Room all alone because the banquet’s was too busy and every staff was busy in some other banquets. For different function, different types of setup’s and decorations were used. Events happened in the following days were IIT Bombay- Washington University, Rotary of Mumbai, ASNO ( Asiatic Society of Neuro-Oncology ), Engagement and Wedding. Food Production Staff Cafeteria – Duration in the Department – 2 weeks Weeks from – 20th Nov,12 – 2nd Dec,12 Worked Under – Mr. Sakharam Patil (Head Chef) Mr. Sameer (Asst. Head Chef) Reporting Time – 7:00 am – 3:00pm Work Performed – Reporting to essays work was at and drinking, 7 , Started with chopping of ap prose essays Onions.

Chopped 4 crates of driving and drinking ladyfingers alone, took 3 hours for the work, Chopped Cucumbers. Good For The Black. Chopped carrots, Tomatoes, Bottle gourd. Peeled carrots, Bottle gourd, cucumbers. Driving And Drinking. Helped in preparation of Paneer tikka, Chicken Cutlets, Kulfi, Veg Korma, Mix Vegetables, Chicken Kheema. Thesis For The Black. Made Papad. Marinated Chicken with tandoori masala for Midnight snacks. Sea Lounge Kitchen Duration in the Department – 1 weeks Weeks from – 20th Nov,12 – 2nd Dec,12 Worked Under – Mr. Harpreet Singh ( Asst. Driving. Head Chef ) Mr.

Agashya ( Head Chef) Reporting Time – 7:00 am – 3:00pm Work Performed – Chopping of fruits, Making of Akuri ( A dish which is similar to Indian Egg-Bhurji but in akuri Onions and ap prose essays Ginger and garlic paste is also used). Prepared Tar tare Sauce. Driving And Drinking. Chef Harpreet was very good as well as persuasive, he wanted me to grasp each and full assignment every thing that I can from his restaurant, but the same was not seen in driving and drinking the Head Chef, he was avoiding me on giving any work instead was just telling me to get things from other departments such as fruits, bacon etc. But because of Chef Harpreet I was able to good thesis for the black cat learn many things such as Presentation, which he says is the Important part of plating of food which is essay indeed true, learnt how to make chat items of all kinds, Made roastee, frying of fish. Made French toast. Prepared Hollandaise sauce. Also the full assignment area your working at should always be kept neat and driving and drinking tidy. I. Ap Prose Essays. R. D Kitchen ( In-Room Dining) Duration in the Department – 1 weeks Weeks from – 24th Dec,12 – 30th Dec,12 Worked Under – Chef Daruwalla ( Head Chef ) Chef Apurva ( Head Chef ) Reporting Time – 12:00 pm – 8:00pm Work Performed – Every day after coming to work i had to go and check the Walk-In, just in case if the walk in is dirty I had to clean it and place everything properly, and see if the tagging of all the food items are properly done or not. Cleaning An Roasting of essay Bacon – Everyday around 14 packets of bacon are cleaned and roasted for IRD as well as Shamiana restaurant and Sea Lounge at the IRD Kitchen. These bacon are cleaned and all the fat are removed and they are placed on ap prose essays, a butter paper properly aligned in driving and drinking essay a Steel tray and kept in book report the oven. after around 15 minutes they are removed and the juice is and drinking essay separated from the ap prose essays bacon and the bacon is ready.

Making of Sausages – Pork and chicken sausages were made and driving and drinking while making these sausages, little amount of oil is used on them or else it will either burn them or change the taste of the sausage. Prepared akuri, porridge, Bechamel sauce and Pan Cake Batter. Butchery Duration in the Department – 1 weeks Weeks from – 31st Dec 12 – 6th Jan 13 Worked Under – Mr. Thesis Black. Vishwanath (Head Chef) Mr. Pranay ( Asst. Head Chef) Reporting Time – 8:30 am – 4:00pm Work Performed – – De-skinning of Chicken, Cutting of Chicken, Removing wings, Separating Chicken breasts and from chicken breasts, removing chicken supreme. Making chicken tikka pieces.

Preparing chicken kheema. Driving Essay. – Tagging and Packing of essays on co education Different meat products. – Making Lamb racks. – Preparing beef fillets, beef heads. – De-veining of prawns and removing of its outer shell. – Learnt to De-skin and clean chicken in less than 5-minutes. Main Kitchen Duration in driving and drinking the Department – 1 weeks Weeks from – 14th Jan, 13 – 20th Jan, 13 Worked Under – Chef Sagar Chef Ramu Chef Farhan Reporting Time – 9:00 am – 6:00pm Work Performed – Worked under Non-Veg and Entremets Section. Preparing Cheese chilly tartlets. Making bechamel Sauce. Chopping of Olives and Slicing of Onions. Description. Preparing lasagna Frying of Fish, Preparing Chicken Cutlets, Preparing Chicken Tikka, Frying of Chicken. Stacking of all the food properly in the Walk-in. Preparing Cheese wontons, Pepper Jalapenos, Lamb Cutlets, Chicken tikka, Veg Hariyali Kebab, Fish pepper. Q. How different was your on Job training different from the and drinking theoretical inputs given in the college ? And what is your learning outcome of this ? A. From my entire industrial training exposure, I have gained more knowledge about the hotel industry and its functions. Learning things in theory and applying them in real life is totally different, when it comes to homework club applying them in driving situations makes them 10 times harder.

And when you are facing problems it makes you learn quicker and makes you remember things better. Also, The hotel Industry Changes very quickly, just like the Technology Industry, Hotel industry also keeps on changing . Therefore, Colleges should be well connected to what’s the new thing that’s happening in grudge book the Hotel and driving essay what all new technologies are being used and what all old things are removed and full assignment instead new thing that are implemented in the hotel. Driving And Drinking Essay. So that Student’s should well prepared while going to the industry and on implementing them. Essays. So my learning outcome from this Industrial training is that I can handle any situation easily with the theoretical as well practical knowledge that I have acquired. Also learning about essay new things has increased my thinking capability, on how a hotel works and homework names how you have to essay generate revenue through your speaking ability to keep your source of income alive. Thesis Project. Q . Driving Essay. Which is Your Chosen Department and How do you propose to book 13 be the best in department ? A. My chosen department is Front Office. Only because from Day-1, I had a special interest in this part of the hotel industry.

And after acquiring a particular set of practical knowledge, now I have to just work on driving and drinking, improving it better so that when the good cat time comes on applying it into use I can do way more better than what i did in my Industrial Training. Also the Hotel keeps on changing so i have to very well in touch with what’s going around the hotel industry so as to be aware of driving what all new methods and technologies are used. SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT Just like the airlines have an Online boarding pass through an E-Ticket, in a similar way, the hotel could have a check-in form online, at the time of their reservation after the payment has been settled, so that they are not kept waiting for manually filling the form and wasting time. Master. This can be done with the existing TIC guests as the hotel already has all their. information. As a similar process is driving and drinking already been carried out for good thesis for the black, repeat clientele, this should be done for first timers as well, to save time.

My second suggestion is that, industrial trainees should be given some more exposure along with some responsibility under a seniors guidance to get better learning experience. My overall experience has been great at the Taj Mahal Palace, Mumbai. The managers and the working staff have played a major role in my development and working as an and drinking essay, industrial trainee at the Taj Mahal Palace, Mumbai. Thank You.

Write My Essay : 100% Original Content -
How to Write an Essay on Drunk Driving

A for and against essay about the internet. And Drinking Essay! Look at the essay and do the exercises to improve your writing skills. Thesis! Do the preparation exercise first. Then read the text and driving essay do the other exercises. What's your opinion? Do you think the internet is bad for young people? For young people it is. They shoud be surervised while accessing the internet, because they might find pornographic content, violent content and such. Internet, an blue, invention which still amazes people in is own way, is not always good.

It has really bad side effects on young adults. As in driving essay, the essay, the young people get addicted to online games and they become addicted to the internet quickly. As we can see, there are many more online games being made like Pokemon Go, etc. is grudge blue really dangerous for young people. I think it really should have a age limit. And also we must be strict about the rules of age limit on internet too. I#039;m also a young adult but I find internet uninteresting and dangerous so I approve of it having age limits. Driving And Drinking Essay! For YOUNG PEOPLE yes it is.

I think Internet is very useful in schools and in work. It#039;s also handy when you need to communicate. On the other hand a lot of people are addicted from sites like facbook, twitter or instagram. I also agree that learning on ap prose essays, the internet (like here ont the british council ;) ) is and drinking very usefull . Blue Book 13! So in conclusion internet is essay possibly the most usefull thing that we ever invented. :) I agree with all of you, but what about learning how to play a musical instrument?

I think internet can be very good for teenagers because it helps them a lot especially for essays, projects and homeworks, but it can be also very bad because children spend too much time online. I like internet because I can listen to songs onYouTube and I use British Councile:) Hi BigBen6464. I'm glad to hear that you enjoy practising English here :) Is there anything in particular that you like on the site? Jonathan (LearnEnglish Teens Team) Thanks! I like your reading skills practice, stories about UK and What is it? in Study Break. British Council really helps me with my vocabulary.

I love it! I think the internet is an homework, amazing tool which can be used for equally amazing things, but only in the hands of the right person. One bad aspect of internet is that anyone could acess anything anytime. That means there is a lot of inappropriate content out driving and drinking there, but a good person is able to avoid it. In my opinion, though internet is very good and useful, but some young people use it for bad things. Such as playing computer games and grudge blue get addict with it. Many parents has banned the and drinking essay, children not allowed to full assignment play forever,1 week or a day or so. But they never keep their word because, of course, parents love their kids, that is why after just a while,they let their children play AGAIN with their games, so really though, I think internet is driving useful with good children,and it is full assignment bad with bad children. I totaly agree. It all depends from parents.

If they let children to spend too much time online children will get a bad habit when they grow up. Driving And Drinking! You#039;re quite right! I agree with your good comment in point: #039;I think internet is useful with good children, and it is bad with bad children#039;. !! :) In my opinion, Internet is one of the greatest people created. You have an access to thesis for the black billions of driving and drinking libraries from your computer, you are able to ap prose essays speak with your friends even if they are on and drinking essay, the other side of the ap prose essays, world. Many people work using the and drinking, Internet. Ap Prose Essays! Now let#039;s mention disadvantages of the essay, Internet and web-technologies. Firstly, many people nowadays become addicted and book report 13 can#039;t survive for more than an hour without computer or smartphone. They need to publish their photos in social networks, chat with 7 people in one moment and read new posts in their favourite online communities.

Young people sometimes find their online-life better than the real one. The second disadvantage is that nobody can guarantee the driving essay, safety of your personal data. Everyone has heard stories about hackers that published private and scandal photos of data base of the big company. It#039;s not really pleasant to on co education in pakistan know that somebody can easily find out all your secrets. To sum up, Internrt is a wonderful tool for searching the necessary information, but social networks is quite tricky part of World Wide Web. I think the internet very useful for us .bcz we can get anything without spend alot of and drinking essay time in looking it . everything when we use it excessively and more than usually #039;it will be badthing. Well, we must admit that on this perfectly imperfect planet nothing entirely good or entirely bad exists. Internet is included. Surely it was meant for full assignment connecting people from all continents, but as the human mind has no border line we found out how to essay use it for different things that provide us either with information or amusement. It is said that the ap prose essays, Internet is a good servant but a bad master.

Therefore, we can see that the problem isn#039;t in the Internet itself but rather in the humans, as it is us who are using it and who are asked FOR WHAT we are using it. So for our irresponsibility we shouldn#039;t blame the Internet but ourselves as we are unable to use a powerful tool for our own improvement but we use it for our own unwanted degradation. I think that#039;s quite right!! Nowadays, Internet has been the most important thing in driving, mutimedia life. Personally, l consider that the book 13, internet is bad or not,which depends on users. I think the Internet is something that we have to know, and driving we should know what is good and bad for us, and keep ourselves away from what can damage ourselves in any way. I think it is the same for essays education in pakistan young people, we have to be responsible, because the Internet is a tool that helps us either with the school, or with any ordinary situation. i think internet is useful for everyone. Essay! If it was a bad thing, something awful, it would have changed instead of reaching the whole world. Is something crazy, used 24hrs a day, everyday of the week, a lot of information, and a lot of people online.

About teenagers who are addicted to games, that depends on each family. Ap Prose Essays! Parents could create rules, so no one would be in a bad position. And that also depends on the teenager#039;s sense of what he or she can or can#039;t do. It#039;s impossible to live without internet in a society like nowdays, it#039;s just so easy to make a research, work on a project. c#039;mon, does anyone here wants to spend hours and hours looking for few informations? Internet is useful for everyone, for young and old people. There#039;s a lot of sites that can help us a lot. But, today Internet ha gone too far away. Almost, there#039;s no home without the internet(more than 70% in whole world are with internet). Yes, there are a good and a bad sites on the Internet.

We have different web-sites(Facebook,Tumlr, Twitter, Instagram. ) that shows us a different world. We can learn a lot of driving and drinking essay things (English, French. Master! ) and a lot of other things. But we all know that Internet isn#039;t so much safe.Even if we think that we have good hide it our information, we don#039;t. There#039;s a lot of dangerous people in the world. To sum up, I completely agree with essay. No, i don`t thing internet bad for young people, because there is many information in the internet. Driving! In my opinion, I dont think Internet is full assignment bad for people. Driving Essay! Without the ap prose essays, Internet, I cannot learn language (English) by myself and I wouldn#039;t be able to and drinking access to lots of grudge 13 useful information that school doesn#039;t teach me. On the other hand, internet is bad only when people dont know how to use it wisely. If young people use the Internet for studying and and drinking essay relaxing in proper way, internet would be very useful. To me, the internet#039;s the most wonderful tool that human had created.

In my own perspective, the Internet plays an thesis description, important role in the communicating barrier. As you can see, people all around the world are using the Internet, including the driving essay, elderly. We communicate with each other using the internet and it really helps us to stay connected with one another. Besides, without the full assignment, internet, how are the countries going to develop? Our knowledge and the view to driving the outside world, the perspective to master thesis description the outside of our comfort zone will be just limited, like a frog in the well. So, why not? The internet is the and drinking essay, best connection between an individual to the whole wide world. It#039;s definitely a boon. Grudge Book Report 13! Internet is very usefull for driving and drinking essay us.

Internet is particularly useful for everyone, nearly all things are on the internet, you can get anything by only searching on it. Internet seems becoming really important nowadays, it helps people a lot, for example i use internet for learning English, reading news and doing research for my tasks. Good Black Cat! However, internet also can give many bad effects, people become so fanatical on social media and often forget about driving and drinking essay time and everything they should do. I completely disagree that internet is bad for ap prose essays teenagers, internet can be useful or useless, it depends on the way people use the internet. How does this photo make you feel?

Can you write a caption for it? . Look carefully. What's this everyday object? Play Wordshake and see how many points can you get in 3 minutes. © British Council The United Kingdom's international organisation for cultural relations and driving educational opportunities. A registered charity: 209131 (England and Wales) SC037733 (Scotland).

Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers -
Drinking And Driving Essay - 1038 Words - brightkite com

essays and invective Slavoj #381;i#382;ek: Say Anything. In The Fright of Real Tears: Krzysztof Kieslowski between Theory and Post?Theory (London: BFI, 2001), Slavoj #381;i#382;ek makes some criticisms of my arguments bearing on the history of film style. Driving And Drinking Essay! I reply to those criticisms in the last chapter of Figures Traced in Light (pp. Master Project Description! 260264). But there is driving and drinking essay much more to say about FRT , and this online essay supplements my remarks in Figures . The Book and essays on co education in pakistan the Background. Most of FRT offers standard film criticism, providing impressionistic readings of various Kieslowski films in regard to recurring themes, visual motifs, dramatic structures, borrowed philosophical concepts, and the like. #381;i#382;ek also reiterates 1970s argument about how film editing “sutures” the viewer into the text.

I’ll have almost nothing to driving and drinking essay, say about these stretches of FRT . But #381;i#382;ek launches the book with an introduction and on co in pakistan two chapters criticizing arguments made in a collection of essays edited by and drinking, myself and Noël Carroll, Post?Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996). The subtitle of #381;i#382;ek’s book indicates the centrality of what he takes to grudge blue report, be the driving and drinking, Post?Theory movement, even though he doesn’t pursue arguments about it through the book. Indeed, the first two chapters seem to me awkwardly welded onto a fairly conventional book of free-associative film interpretation. Why invoke Post?Theory at all, then? The Preface to FRT by Colin MacCabe explains that he asked #381;i#382;ek “to address the weaknesses and insularity of film studies as they had developed in the university sector over the previous two decades” (vii). Film studies, MacCabe feels, has developed a “narrowness and sterility” (vii). It’s worth pausing on the ironies here. MacCabe was one of the moving spirits of Screen magazine in the 1970s, where the foundations of Lacanian and neo-Marxist film theory were laid.

As MacCabe put it in 1974: “Given Screen ’s commitment to theoretical understanding of film, the magazine has been engaged over the last five years in the elaboration of the various advances in semiotics, structuralism, psychoanalysis and Marxism.” 1 It is this blend that has been endlessly reiterated in club names, the precincts of academic film studies. Across many years, it was the orthodoxy. For many of us, that trend seemed and still seems “narrow and sterile.” Judge for driving, yourself, based on this passage signed by MacCabe from the golden age of Screen : The problem is to blue 13, understand the terms of the construction of the subject and driving and drinking the modalities of the names, replacement of this construction in driving and drinking essay, specific signifying practices, where “replacement” means not merely the repetition of the place of that construction but also, more difficultly, the supplacementthe overplacing: supplementation or, in certain circumstances, supplantation (critical interruption)of that construction in the place of its repetition. 2. It’s a remarkable sentence in many respects, but assuming that it can be explicated, what saves this intellectual project from narrowness and sterility? In the 1970s MacCabe declared that this theory was committed to homework, Marx’s concept of and drinking, class struggle. Exactly how Lacanian psychoanalysis was to assist the class struggle, and why it should be preferred to other means of grudge blue book report 13, assisting that struggle, was never made clear in Screen . In any event, MacCabe trots this claim out again as another aim of driving essay, #381;i#382;ek’s book, which “intervenes” in contemporary debates “without ever abandoning questions of class struggle and the unconscious” (viiiix). Once more, neither MacCabe nor #381;i#382;ek explains why one cannot be a good socialist without reading Lacan. (More on this below.) MacCabe’s objections apply, he says, not to film historians, who have conducted “vital and book 13 important [sic] work” (vii). And Drinking! This too harbors irony, since the Theoretical Correctness of Screen and its followers blocked historical research from developing in the 1970s.

Primary-document history was labeled “empiricist” and full assignment “positivist,” Screen published almost no such work, and for driving and drinking essay, decades afterward, many historians feared being attacked for their lack of Grand Theory acumen. Efforts to study early cinema history, the history of the U.S. film industry, and the like emerged in good for the, quite different venues from the BFI publications. Now, however, MacCabe welcomes historical research as an area of driving and drinking essay, film studies. Rather, it’s film theory that has become inert, “either banally rehashed or obtusely opposed” (viii). Though MacCabe isn’t specific, it seems that the obtuse opposition is incarnated in “ ‘Post?Theory’ and essays cognitivism” (viii). And Drinking! I say “seems” because this is as close as MacCabe gets to naming names: “For those followers of fashion who look for a retreat from full assignment, Marx and Freud, a hideous mimicking of the threadbare nonsense of the ‘third way,’ this book will be a grave disappointment” (viii). And Drinking Essay! Just parsing this cryptic sentence raises questions: What fashion dictates a retreat from Marx and Freud? One would think that Post?Theory was sweeping the grudge book report 13, academy. And why didn’t MacCabe object to fashion when Screen theory was reiterated uncritically for driving and drinking essay, decades? Presumably MacCabe finds Post?Theory has parallels with Tony Blair and New Labour’s “Third Way.” 3 What are these affinities?

What grounds can MacCabe have for linking ideas about cinema floated by Midwest college professors to a crisis in master project, British politics, let alone finding the parallels “hideous”? In any event, what’s wrong with positing alternatives to and drinking essay, intellectual positions? In any field of inquiry, can’t there be a third, or fourth, or fifth way of for the, asking and answering questions? Evidently MacCabe’s purpose isn’t to make a claim or back a case, merely to fulminate, but even his terms of abuse (“fashion,” “hideous,” “threadbare nonsense”) aren’t specific. Apart from reviving the allegiance of Lacan and class struggle, MacCabe says, “#381;i#382;ek’s account of Post?Theory lays bare both its obvious fallacies and its more hidden vanities” (ix). On the contrary. Although MacCabe designated #381;i#382;ek his hitman, it’s more than a little surprising to find that at driving, nearly every opportunity #381;i#382;ek doesn’t engage with the ap prose essays, substantive arguments of Post?Theory at driving and drinking essay, all.

There are three essays in the anthology that directly criticize the psychoanalytic project in film theory: Stephen Prince’s “Psychoanalytic Film Theory and the Problem of the ap prose essays, Missing Spectator”; my “Contemporary Film Studies and driving essay the Vicissitudes of Grand Theory”; and Noël Carroll’s “Prospects for Film Theory: A Personal Assessment.” How does #381;i#382;ek address the challenges these essays propose? His chief strategy consists of blue, invective and rhetorical questions. Driving Essay! “Does what [the Post?Theory attacks] describe as Theory, or what they attribute to Theory, not read as a comically simplified caricature of Lacan, Althusser et al? Can one really take seriously Noël Carroll’s description of Gaze theorists?” (4). Full Assignment! #381;i#382;ek takes you no further. Driving And Drinking! No argument, no evidence, just dismissal à la MacCabe. Then, #381;i#382;ek asks, who are the “Lacanians” referred to in Post?Theory ? “Except for project description, Joan Copjec, myself, and some of my Slovene colleagues, I know of no cinema theorist who effectively accepts Lacan as his or her ultimate background” (2). He goes on to mention other writers, such as Laura Mulvey and Kaja Silverman, who accept Lacan’s descriptions of patriarchy but criticize him as a “phallogocentrist” (2). What’s odd here is that Carroll, Prince, and I don’t attack “Lacanians”; the phrase is and drinking essay not to be found in our essays. Prince concentrates on Freud, while Carroll discusses Lacan as one ingredient of 1970s and 1980s film theory. My essay emphasizes what I call subject-position theory, of master thesis project, which Lacanian doctrines form only driving, part.

All three essays speak of psychoanalytic film theory and psychoanalytically inclined theorists. To use a term #381;i#382;ek employs often in ap prose essays, FRT , one might say that the driving and drinking, Lacanians in these essays exist only as his phantasms. In any event, he doesn’t try to fight these phantoms by defending Lacan’s account of mental life against its many rivals. He accepts, as we’ll see shortly, key premises of Lacanianism on faith, as do many people he wouldn’t characterize as deep-dyed Lacanians. #381;i#382;ek’s complaints about lumping Lacanians together diverts our attention from the point at essays on co, issue. Whether Lacan forms an “ultimate background,” whatever that means, isn’t worth disputing. #381;i#382;ek knows perfectly well that a great many film scholars have cited Lacan and used his work to bolster theoretical or interpretive claims. Although the three essays invoke many writers by driving and drinking essay, name (and my essay analyzes one essay by the #381;i#382;ek-endorsed Lacanian Copjec), the crucial issue is the role Lacan’s theories play within the intellectual doctrines of contemporary film theory.

This #381;i#382;ek doesn’t address. Once we get past rhetorical questions and ap prose essays diversionary tactics, #381;i#382;ek is given an excellent opportunity to engage with Post?Theory by Stephen Prince’s essay. Prince argues, I think plausibly, that psychoanalysis lacks reliable data on driving which to build its theories. Records of the clinical session are available only to grudge blue book report 13, the analyst (yielding “nontraceable disclosures”); there are no established standards for essay, interpreting the patient’s discourse; and the analyst inevitably filters the full range of the patient’s reports, summarizing and inflecting them in her interpretation. Prince then argues that these failings are present in book 13, Freud’s own classic paper, “A Child is Being Beaten.” Prince goes on to suggest that psychoanalytic theory of cinema is at a disadvantage because of its weak account of perception and its resolute ignoral of the and drinking essay, ways in which cinema resembles the world, both of which can be better accounted for by rival theories. There are many things #381;i#382;ek (and MacCabe, the book’s patron) would object to here.

But #381;i#382;ek never discusses any of them. Grudge Book Report 13! It’s entirely possible that Prince has mischaracterized psychoanalytic method, or has misread Freud’s paper, or has misunderstood Lacanian film theory. But #381;i#382;ek doesn’t make any effort to show weaknesses in the essay. He merely mocks the title (p. 1). Likewise, you’d think that he’d slice my essay to and drinking essay, ribbons. “Contemporary Film Studies” delineates two trends in homework club, the field, what I call subject-position theory (the Screen legacy) and culturalism. Driving And Drinking! I trace those trends historically and homework club names try to show continuities between them. Driving And Drinking! The conceptual continuities I argue for involve social constructivism, theories of subjectivity, the centrality of identification, and an underlying commitment to semiotics. I also argue that subject-position adherents and culturalists follow similar argumentative routines, notably a commitment to doctrine-driven inquiry, a fondness for pasting together ideas from quite divergent theorists, a reliance on association rather than linear reasoning, and a commitment to hermeneutic applications of theory to films (producing “readings”). Education! On each point I advance some critical remarks, including charges of self-contradiction. A philosopher ought to driving and drinking essay, be rubbing his hands at the prospect of going after this essay.

I could be vulnerable from many angles. Homework Names! #381;i#382;ek could attack my characterization of driving essay, Freud, Lacan, and full assignment the rest; my critiques of same; and above all my outline of the two trends. Most important, although I didn’t have #381;i#382;ek in mind when I wrote the essay, he himself instantiates all the conceptual commitments and rhetorical habits I criticize. His work is a pastiche of many, widely varying intellectual sources (from Ernest Laclau to Stephen Jay Gould). He is an associationist par excellence. His use of films is driving and drinking essay purely hermeneutic, with each film playing out essays education allegories of theoretical doctrines.

And he never doubts his masters Hegel and Lacan, exemplifying the tendency I characterize this way: “The pronouncements of Lacan, Althusser, Baudrillard, et cie are often simply taken on faith” (21). So my complaints should strike very close to home. Yet not a peep from #381;i#382;ek on any of driving and drinking essay, these points. If I’m right, his theoretical program is seriously on the wrong track, but he feels no obligation to ap prose essays, engage with my claims. This isn’t the thinker MacCabe says is and drinking essay “determined to homework, follow the and drinking, logic of any concept or text through to its bitter or sweet end” (FRT, viii). 4. Carroll and ap prose essays #381;i#382;ek 1: Reply as Confirmation. #381;i#382;ek is driving and drinking essay a philosopher, so perhaps we’d expect him to master description, engage most fully with another of his profession. And Drinking! Noël Carroll’s essay “Prospects for Film Theory: A Personal Assessment” presents criticisms that are severe and pointed. Carroll argues that proponents of Grand Theory embrace a monolithic conception of theorizing, conflate theorizing with interpreting specific films, use political correctness to attack their opponents, unwontedly charge opponents with “formalism,” and exhibit a bias against the concept of truth.

Remarkably, #381;i#382;ek responds to not a single one of these charges. He doesn’t, contra MacCabe, lay bare any fallacies, nor does he mount what he promises in his introduction will be a “critical dialogue with cognitivist/historicist Post?Theory” (7). What he does lay bare, apparently all unawares, are statements wide open to thesis project description, Carroll’s objections. Here is Carroll: Proponents of the Theory let on that the Theory grew out of the student movement and out of a resistance to oppression everywhere. And Drinking Essay! Consequently, from their point of view, criticism of the Theory virtually represents a clear and present danger to ap prose essays, the very Revolution itself. Driving And Drinking Essay! Anyone who opposes the Theory, for whatever reason, is politically suspect. Criticisms of the dubious psychoanalytic premises of the Theory are denounced as reactionaryin a political sense!as if a belief in the equality of races requires assent to Lacan and the rest of the master thesis description, pet paraphernalia of the Theory. (45). MacCabe’s evocation of the and drinking essay, class struggle in blue, his introduction strikes this note, as does #381;i#382;ek’s promise to show how Kieslowski’s work, “the site of antagonistic ideological tensions [sic], of the ‘class struggle in art’, can be redeemed by a Lacanian approach” (7). #381;i#382;ek begins his book by saying that the Post?Theory trend is “often sustained by a stance of profound political resignation, by a will to essay, obliterate the traces and disappointments of grudge blue report 13, political engagement” (13).

The one piece of evidence he supplies for this is startlingly shaky. #381;i#382;ek takes the scholar Ben Brewster as “emblematic of the essay, present-day state of cinema theory” (13). Why? Because Brewster shifted from description, being a proponent of Screen theory to becoming a film historian displaying an “exclusive preoccupation with pre?1917 cinema” (13). Why does this matter? Because Brewster focuses on a period “prior to and drinking, the October Revolution, as if to emphasise the will to full assignment, obliterate the trauma of the failed leftist involvement in Theory” (13). About #381;i#382;ek’s diagnosis that Brewster’s research constitutes a form of fetishistic disavowal reminiscent of a reluctance to look at feminine genitals, I shall say nothing.

I just want to point out that Brewster has not restricted his research to cinema before 1917, not even in essay, the book #381;i#382;ek mentions in a footnote, 5 so the tenuous thread of association fails even as a literary conceit. On Co In Pakistan! On its first page, FRT presents a strained reach for cleverness at the expense of nuance and driving and drinking accuracy. We’ll encounter this strategy again. For our theorists, politics equals left politics equals the ap prose essays, glory years of driving and drinking, May 1968 theory. Marx is always invoked, with nods to Eurocommunism, Althusser, and, surprisingly, Mao.

In 1974 MacCabe saluted the Chinese Cultural Revolution as proof that ideology remained a potent force. 6 In a recent DVD liner note on Godard’s Tout va bien , he describes the thesis for the, Cultural Revolution as Mao’s effort to have the Red Guards “revolt against the ruling state and party apparatus. The young were encouraged to question authority and to insist on the importance of the class struggle.” 7 MacCabe doesn’t mention that Mao stirred up the young in order to regain his power over that same party apparatus, or that the Red Guards were not encouraged to question his authority, or that the ten years of Cultural Revolution shut down China’s education, exiled intellectuals to labor camps, destroyed centuries of cultural artifacts, killed hundeds of thousands of people, and ruined the lives of millions more. #381;i#382;ek also invokes the Great Helmsman: “To put it in driving and drinking, good old Maoist terms, the principal contradiction of today’s cinema studies. To continue in a Maoist vein, I am tempted to[identify a given opposition] as the second, nonantagonistic contradiction of cinema studies, to be resolved through discussion and self-criticism”(1, 2). Education In Pakistan! Needless to say, why Maoism is driving and drinking essay good as well as old doesn’t concern #381;i#382;ekperhaps because, like many of his other citations, this tip of the hat to the cult of personality serves merely as an effort at knowing rhetoric.

Certainly self-criticism doesn’t enter his text. So Carroll’s diagnosisthat theoretical sallies are often justified by an unwarranted link to a particular brand of politicsis borne out by the very book seeking to demolish Carroll’s views. Similarly, Carroll’s essay argues that in general film theories don’t necessarily bear traces of the theorist’s political orientation. “I have evolved theories of movie music and point-of-view editing, but they do not, in club names, any sense that could be called logical, imply my political position about anything from gun control, to sexual harassment, to communal ownership of the means of and drinking, production” (46). The reason is that theories generally underdetermine political viewpoints. “Given theories may be espoused by full assignment, either the and drinking essay, forces of light or the forces of darkness” (47). We might expect this to arouse a sustained critique from #381;i#382;ek, who obviously doesn’t believe in the underdetermination of theories; but no such luck. He remains silent. There’s yet another moment in which #381;i#382;ek confirms Carroll’s critique. Thesis Cat! Carroll’s essay criticizes totalizing conceptions of theory:

Under its aegis, the driving and drinking, film theorist sets out to subsume every aspect of cinematic phenomena under the putative laws and categories of his or her minimally customized version of the reigning orthodoxy. Theorizing becomes the routine application of some larger, unified theory to questions of cinema, which procedure unsurprisingly churns out roughly the same answers, or remarkably similar answers, in every case. The net result, in short, is theoretical impoverishment (41). And here is #381;i#382;ek, claiming that Post?Theory. starts to behave as if there were no Marx, Freud, semiotic theory of ideology, i.e. as if we can magically return to some kind of naivete before things like the unconscious, the book report, overdetermination of and drinking, our lives by the decentred symbolic processes, and so forth became part of our theoretical awareness (14). #381;i#382;ek can’t entertain the thesis for the cat, prospect that ideas can be “part of our theoretical awareness” and still be invalid. Suppose, just suppose, that all these “things”points of doctrineare shot through with conceptual and empirical mistakes. This is what Prince, Carroll, and I are saying.

We don’t ignore this theory; we criticize it. Driving Essay! Being skeptical about weak theories isn’t a return to innocence. It’s an advance; it can cast out error. The task is not to call us naïve but rather to show that the unconscious, the overdetermination of so on and so forth remain valid ideas. Master Project! The way to show this is not by waxing nostalgic for the days when everyone read Althusser, but by overcoming our criticisms. Yet in #381;i#382;ek’s hands, confirming Carroll’s objections once more, Lacanian theory functions as a set of axioms or dogmas rather than working ideas to driving, be subjected to critical discussion. Post?Theory argues against the very idea of Theory and description supports the idea of driving essay, theories and master thesis theorizing (p. Driving Essay! xiv).

Theories operate at full assignment, many levels of and drinking, generality and tackle many different questions. Theorizing is good for the cat a process of proposing, refining, correcting, and perhaps rejecting answers, in the context of a multidisciplinary conversation. But for #381;i#382;ek, the unconscious, the overdetermination of our lives, and all the rest is driving and drinking essay Theory entire and whole. No intellectual activity (save “historical research”) lives outside it, and it can be discussed only by full assignment, those already accepting the and drinking essay, premises of its sacred texts. And once the thesis black, only correct Theory is packaged with the only correct political attitudes, you have a powerful weapon against anyone who differs. FRT confirms Carroll’s claim: “The Theory has been effectively insulated from sustained logical and empirical analysis by a cloak of political correctness” (45). Carroll and driving #381;i#382;ek 2: Dialectics of Inquiry and of Nature. #381;i#382;ek ignores almost all the substantive points Carroll makes in his essay. Master Thesis! The one issue he singles out is Carroll’s proposal that film studies should be more self-consciously dialectical.

Carroll explains at several points what he means by this. And Drinking Essay! In his sense, dialectics is an alternative to the method #381;i#382;ek embraces, that of deriving a film theory from axioms or first principles. Instead, dialectical exchange is a form of club names, debate, “defending one’s own theory by demonstrating that it succeeds where alternative theories falter” (56). Driving! More extensively: Theories are framed in specific historical contexts of research for the purpose of answering certain questions, and the relative strengths of theories are assayed by comparing the thesis description, answers they afford to the answers proposed by alternative theories.

This conception of theory evaluation is pragmatic because: (1) it compares actual, existing rival answers to driving and drinking essay, the questions at hand (rather than every logically conceivable answer); and (2) because it focuses on solutions to contextually motivated theoretical problems (rather than searching for answers to any conceivable question one might have about cinema) (56). #381;i#382;ek does object to Carroll’s point, but he misconstrues it. He says that this conception of dialectics is “simply the notion of cognition as the gradual progress of our always limited knowledge through the testing of specific hypotheses” (14). Now this is plainly not what the passage quoted above says. #381;i#382;ek eliminates the communal and comparative dimensions of inquiry Carroll invokes, and introduces “the testing of specific hypotheses.” He goes on to add that the process is “unending,” assigning to Carroll “a modest view of endless competive struggle” (15). But again, Carroll does not say that the process is essays infinite. He says that by eliminating error and mounting sound theories, we can arrive at reliable if approximate truths. These theories may stand for a long time; perhaps a better theory will never come along (58). “There is no reason to concede that we cannot also craft film theories in and drinking essay, the here and now that are approximately true” (58). There is nothing inherently unending about this process. So #381;i#382;ek has misunderstood Carroll’s conception of black, dialectical inquiry. But that’s not all.

Having rewritten Carroll’s claims, #381;i#382;ek blurts out: “Well, if this is dialectics, then Karl Popper, the most aggressive and dismissive critic of Hegel, was the greatest dialectician of them all!” (15). Driving! This expostulation encapsulates many assumptions, all of them questionable. Homework Names! First, Carroll’s conception of theory-building doesn’t follow Popper, since Carroll has made no reference to falsifiability as the driving, key criterion for conjecture and refutation. Carroll’s view of grudge blue 13, collective problem-solving through debate is a far broader position in the philosophy of science than Popper’s account. Secondly, as Carroll points out in a subsequent version of and drinking essay, his essay, “an unbiased examination of the history of philosophy will show, I believe, that Hegel has no patent on dialectics.” 8 I’d go further and observe that the concept of dialectic derives from ancient Greece, and it simply means “conversing.” Carroll is using the ap prose essays, concept in driving essay, its most basic and uncontroversial sense. #381;i#382;ek could have distinguished Carroll’s use from black, that of other thinkers, notably Hegel, but that would require a careful and painstaking response, not a cri de cœur . To assume that Hegel possesses the only valid concept of the dialectic is essay something of an undergraduate howler. Finally, Carroll uses the concept of the dialectic as a regulative and pragmatic principle of blue book report, inquiry. #381;i#382;ek, like Hegel, believes that the dialectic also exists in the world, as a constitutive principle of nature, society, and indeed being itself.

Thus #381;i#382;ek says that there is a dialectic informing the history of film style (pp. Driving And Drinking Essay! 2225). In this way, a particular version of essays, dialectical inquiry is justified by driving, an ontological assumption. #381;i#382;ek brooks no dispute on this: again and again he refers to the “proper” use of dialecticsthe one forged by Hegel and, mysteriously, Freud (25). But he nowhere defends Hegel’s idea of dialectic against ap prose essays the hosts of objections that have been raised by over a century of critics; nor does he defend his somewhat idiosyncratic version of Hegel. 9 Another philosophical slip#381;i#382;ek confuses epistemic criteria with ontological onesand another moment at driving and drinking, which a canonical thinker becomes a security blanket. #381;i#382;ek has one more cluster of objections to Carroll’s conception of full assignment, dialectical theory-building. And Drinking Essay! “Dialectics proper,” he says, is distinguished by good thesis for the, “the way the subject’s position of enunciation is included, inscribed into the process: the cognitivist speaks from the safe position of the excluded observer who knows the relativity and limitation of all human knowledge, including his own” (15). These are presumably the driving and drinking essay, “hidden vanities” to which MacCabe alludes. The easy answer to this claim is this: #381;i#382;ek uses enunciation theory as the basis for his objection. If you don’t accept a theory of enunciation (which neither Carroll nor I do), the full assignment, objection fails. (Note, in passing, #381;i#382;ek’s invocation of driving and drinking, enunciation theory rests upon the oft-cited liar paradox: the semantic contradiction involved in good thesis for the black, saying “I am lying” supposedly exemplifies split subjectivity in all of language.) The equally obvious riposte is that Carroll, cited above, doesn’t believe in the relativity of all human knowledge (he in fact argues against relativism) and driving instead argues that truth is to full assignment, some degree attainable. Once more #381;i#382;ek has misunderstood the driving essay, claims he’s criticizing.

#381;i#382;ek goes on to create a sort of theoretical ad hominem . Having ascribed “modesty” to the position he attacks, he goes on to say that it’s actually an grudge blue book report arrogant view. But he does this by again caricaturing the and drinking, claims. “When I say, ‘The theory (which I am deploying) is just an impotent mental construct, while real life persists outside,’ or engage in similar modes of education in pakistan, referring to the wealth of and drinking, pre-theoretical experience, the apparent modesty of such statements harbours the arrogant position of enunciation of the blue book 13, subject who assumes the capacity to compare a theory with ‘real life’” (15). In passing, I note that #381;i#382;ek here seems to equate the subject with an entity like an individual, capable of actions like assuming; but this is a philosophical error, as I point out in driving and drinking essay, my Post?Theory contribution (1415). Also in essays on co in pakistan, passing, I note that until #381;i#382;ek shows that enunciation theory is a plausible account of language or mental activity, his diagnosis, which wholly depends on this theory, need cause me no worries. More substantially, Carroll, Prince, and I never say or imply that our theoretical conjectures are “impotent mental constructs” when faced with the teeming reality outside our theories. Where does he get this stuff?

And what’s so arrogant about comparing a theory with real life? #381;i#382;ek does it all the time. And Drinking! Consider this passage from an interview, in which #381;i#382;ek is asked about his fondness for Lenin’s theories: What I like in Lenin is precisely what scares people about him-the ruthless will to full assignment, discard all prejudices. Why not violence? Horrible as it may sound, I think it’s a useful antidote to all the aseptic, frustrating, politically correct pacifism. Let’s take the campaign against smoking in the U.S. Driving And Drinking! I think this is black a much more suspicious phenomenon than it appears to driving and drinking essay, be. If #381;i#382;ek can apply Leninist politics of full assignment, violence to anti-smoking legislation (will he found a Cheka to purge nonsmokers?), I assume that other theorists aren’t being arrogant in talking of how comparatively harmless movies relate to the world we live in. Dialogue versus Monologue. Throughout #381;i#382;ek’s objections to and drinking essay, Carroll’s notion of dialectical inquiry, one blind spot is evident. In his references to full assignment, “testing hypotheses” and the isolated “subject of enunciation,” in his accounts of and drinking, dialectical thinking by thesis cat, the solitary theorist, he ignores the intersubjective dimension of and drinking, theorizing.

Dialectical inquiry proceeds because a researcher belongs to a community committed to both rational and empirical investigation. Blue Book Report! Whatever one’s personal feelings about people arguing against you, the regulative ideal of a research community is respect for argumentation and and drinking essay evidence. People who don’t agree with you aren’t your enemies; their criticisms may be painful, but one cooperates with them in an effort to attain more conceptual precision and empirical adequacy. Yet consider what #381;i#382;ek claims in another book, in commenting on an essay in Post?Theory : Lenin liked to point out that one could often get crucial insights into one’s own weaknesses from the perception of intelligent enemies. So, since the essays education, current essay attempts a Lacanian reading of David Lynch’s Lost Highway , it may be useful to essay, start with a reference to full assignment, “Post?Theory,” the recent cognitivist orientation of cinema studies that establishes its identity by essay, a thorough rejection of Lacanian cinema studies. 10. Lenin, of thesis for the black cat, course, saw his political opponents as his enemies, and he dealt with them as such. But to characterize one’s intellectual opponents this way is revealing of #381;i#382;ek’s attitude toward debate. One doesn’t cooperate with enemies. Another regulative principle of collective truth-seeking is dialogue. Whatever their personal motives, scholars are united in seeking logically sound theories that illuminate a range of phenomena.

That’s what allows debate to flourish. When the community norms flag, debate withers and theory becomes a chorus of monologues. And Drinking! Arguably, though, #381;i#382;ek fails to grasp the intersubjective dimension of on co education in pakistan, theorizing because he doesn’t believe in theory as a conversation within a community, a process of question and and drinking answer and rebuttal. On Co Education! This construal of his attitude toward theory fits what we know of his intellectual demeanor. Consider these reports from an admiring journalist: 11. Bearded, disheveled, and loudBarely pausing to sit down, #381;i#382;ek launches into a monologue so learned and amusing that it could very well appearverbatimin one of the many books he has written (42).

“Discussing Hegel and Lacan is like breathing for Slavoj. I’ve seen him talk about and drinking essay, theory for four hours straight without flagging,” says UCBerkeley’s Judith Butler. When not mediated by the printed page, however, the obsessive-compulsive quality that makes his hyperkinetic prose so exhilarating is somewhat overwhelmingeven, evidently, for #381;i#382;ek himself. Ap Prose Essays! Popping the occasional Xanax to settle his nerves, he tells me about his heart problems and panic attacks. As his eyes dart around the room and his manic monologue becomes more frantic, I fear that I may be his last interviewer. #381;i#382;ek is like a performance artist who is terrified of abandoning the stage; once he starts talking, he seems unable to stop (42). #381;i#382;ek has developed an elaborate set of psychological tricks to manipulate his American students and enable him to have as little contact with them as possible. At the first meeting of each course, he announces that all students will get an driving A and essays in pakistan should write a final paper only if they want to. “I terrorize them by creating a situation where they have no excuse for giving me a paper unless they think it is really good. This scares them so much, that out of driving, forty students, I will get only a few papers,” he says. “And I get away with this because they attribute it to my ‘European eccentricity.’ ” #381;i#382;ek says that he deals with student inquiries in a similar spirit. Ap Prose Essays! “I understand I have to essay, take questions during my lectures, since this is ap prose essays America and everybody is allowed to talk about and drinking essay, everything. Blue Report 13! But when it comes to office hours, I have perfected a whole set of strategies for how to essay, block this,” he says with a smirk. “The real trick, however, is to minimize their access to me and simultaneously appear to be even more democratic!” Initially, #381;i#382;ek scheduled office hours immediately before class so that students could not run on indefinitely.

Then he came up with the thesis, idea of requiring them to submit a written question in advance, on driving essay the assumption that most would be too lazy to master thesis description, do it (they were). Driving Essay! #381;i#382;ek reserves what he calls “the nasty strategy” for large lecture classes in which the students often don’t know one another. “I divide the time into six twenty-minute periods and then fill in the slots with invented names. That way the students think that all the hours are full and I can disappear,” he claims (49). There’s a lot to education, digest hereparticularly the rich image of a theorist who pronounces on all things political, historical, aesthetic, and driving essay psychological criticizing Americans for essays, being “allowed to talk about everything”but you don’t need to be either a cognitivist or a psychoanalyst to hazard one conclusion. An insistent monologist and driving and drinking a teacher confessing himself uninterested in thesis project description, student response might not be able to appreciate the community-driven nature of inquiry postulated by Post?Theory . This, then, is what #381;i#382;ek’s “critical dialogue” with Post?Theory amounts to. Once more Carroll proves prophetic: “Sustained, detailed, intertheoretical debate and criticism is rare in and drinking, the history of film theoryNowadays this tendency is particularly pronounced in discussions of cognitivism, which view is swiftly dismissed by castigating buzz-words like ‘formalism,’ or maybe ‘idealism,’ uttered just before the author goes on to repeat, at length, yet again, the received wisdom of Theory” (57). #381;i#382;ek obviously thinks that he has engaged in a critical dialogue, and he’s not alone. A review 12 of FRT praises #381;i#382;ek as “formidably well-read,” a “subtle theorist” able to operate “at the highest levels of psychological and philosophical abstraction.” The book offers, in full assignment, the reviewer’s opinion, “A mode of driving, aesthetic analysis that fully describes the most spectral and intangible [sic] of film without compromising the underlying theoretical rigor.” Everything I’ve said so far indicates that I can’t agree. Where are the subtleties? Where is the rigor?

The reviewer doesn’t say, passing over the book’s avowedly theoretical chapters in a couple of paragraphs. Perhaps the reviewer accepts #381;i#382;ek’s own conception of Post?Theory . The reviewer says that #381;i#382;ek’s “fierce critique” rests on the idea that Post?Theory “attempts to move away from a reliance on theory and back toward more empirical accounts of film.” Since anyone who read Post?Theory would understand that we plead for better theories, not the elimination of theoretical work, I have to conclude that the reviewer relies on good thesis black #381;i#382;ek’s characterization of the book’s project. And this is a mistake, for #381;i#382;ek makes several errors. First, he claims that the Post?Theory collection is and drinking “a kind of manifesto” of cognitive film theory. 13 This flies in the face of the introduction to Post?Theory , where Carroll and I say, “It needs to be stressed that though a number of the articles in full assignment, this volume are cognitivist, the and drinking essay, volume itself is not a primer in full assignment, cognitivism. The unifying principle in this book is that all the research included exemplifies the possibility of scholarship that is driving not reliant upon homework the psychoanalytic framework that dominates film academia (xvi).” Moreover, there is cognitivist film theory that isn’t “post-theoretical”; presumably many people pursuing cognition-based answers to theoretical questions don’t reject psychoanalysis from the standpoint we adopt. Many psychologists studying filmic perception have probably never heard of Jacques Lacan. I conclude that #381;i#382;ek uses the term “Post?Theory” to sum up a broad movement he takes to be emerging within film studies as the and drinking, principal rival to the psychoanalytic (specifically, Lacanian) paradigm. This makes a conveniently broad target, but only at the expense of subtlety and rigor. When #381;i#382;ek treats the Post?Theory movement as “the cognitivist and/or historicist reaction” to Grand Theory ( FRT , 1), he displays a second confusion. To call the historical essays collected in blue 13, Post?Theory “historicist” is at best ambiguous.

In the relevant sense, historicism involves the belief that concepts held by historical agents at and drinking, a given time are sui generis and can’t be unproblematically translated into terms available at the historian’s moment. For example, Foucault’s position in “What Is an Author?” can be described as historicist. He posits that the modern concept of the author came into existence at a particular time and place and can’t be presumed to operate in earlier circumstances. But historicism in this sense plainly isn’t advocated or even presupposed by the historians in the Post?Theory collection; their essays don’t take a position on this issue. Of course it’s possible that #381;i#382;ek simply means to indicate that the essays are historical studies; but then he’s misusing the term “historicism.” As a philosopher, #381;i#382;ek should be committed to clarifying terms rather than fogging them. At some point someone is likely to say that #381;i#382;ek is full assignment elusive because he’s playful. His flights of fancy try to essay, get you to think outside the box; he’s a provocateur. I suppose this comes down to taste, but I find #381;i#382;ek not provocative at good thesis for the, all.

Praising Lacan, Lenin, and Mao seems to me not rebellion but a retread. And we come at some point to a matter of sincerity. When is driving essay he not being playful? When is he putting forth a claim he’s committed to? For example, in FRT he proposes that pictures have two frames, one external, one internal, “the frame implied by the structure of the homework, painting” (130). “These two frames by definition never overlap” (130). Essay! 14 Yet in his prologue, #381;i#382;ek explains that at a conference, asked to comment on essays on co a picture, he “engaged in a total bluff” (5) by and drinking, positing the existence of these two frames. He goes on to make fun of people who took it seriously: To my surprise, this brief intervention was a huge success, and many following participants referred to the dimension in-between-the-two-frames, elevating it into a term.

This very success made me sad, really sad. What I encountered here was not only the efficiency of a bluff, but a much more radical apathy at the very heart of master description, today’s cultural studies (6). The postmodern emperor doesn’t need a child in the crowd to and drinking essay, point out his nakedness; he does so himself, and mourns the fact that he fooled so many. But the question nags us: Are we to believe the two-frames theory when it’s floated later in the book? Evidently not, since it’s admittedly a bluff.

But perhaps #381;i#382;ek really believes the theory, so that in the prologue, when he says that his theory is essays education in pakistan a bluff, he’s bluffing. This compels us to ask: Might not everything he says about Lacan, Post?Theory, and the rest be a bluff akin to the two-frames bluff? No wonder #381;i#382;ek takes the Liar’s Paradox to be the driving essay, prototype of language use. What others might find a dizzying display of academic cleverness makes me sad too, but perhaps in a different way. Are we wasting our time in expecting #381;i#382;ek to offer reasonable arguments? Fundamental questions of responsibility arise here, especially in relation to a writer not hesitant to condemn the beliefs and actions of essays on co education, others. It’s tedious to be lectured on morality and driving and drinking essay ethics from someone who casually announces petty acts of deceit, like sneaking out of good for the, office hours or fooling gullible academics who are eager to take a master’s every word as a revelation. “Well,” #381;i#382;ek or a sympathetic reviewer might ask me, “can’t we say that he engages seriously and straightforwardly with your claims? He has much to say about your book, On the History of Film Style and your claims about contingent universals in one essay of driving, Post?Theory .” He does indeed. I was surprised, however, that when he turns on his analytical powers, how little his objections amount to. Description! I’ve made my reply in Figures Traced in Light (260264), so I won’t rehash it here.

I think I show that when #381;i#382;ek tries to be serious and dismantle an argument critically, the results are vague, digressive, equivocal, contradictory, and either obviously inaccurate or merely banal. This might explain why he so seldom tries to be analytical. Vagueness, digressions, equivocations, etc. are less apparent if you’re playful. But we can forgive all this, others will reply, because #381;i#382;ek is such a lively writer. Driving And Drinking Essay! Recall that Boynton, above, calls his prose “hyperkinetic” and “exhilarating,” and names him “a dazzlingly acute thinker and prose stylist.” Frankly, I can’t imagine Boynton and I are reading the same writer. As with many contemporary theorists, #381;i#382;ek’s dominant register is what Frederick Crews has called ponderous coyness. Essays Education! 15 His humor is academic, and academic humor is to humor as military intelligence is to intelligence. As for and drinking essay, the texture of the ap prose essays, prose, try to find the acuteness and hyperkinesis here:

The underlying principle and support of this thesis of the symbolic order is that, in each field of meaning, if this field is to be ‘totalised,’ there has to be an additional/excessive signifier which, as it were, gives a positive figure to and drinking, that which cannot be properly included into this field, somewhat like Spinoza’s well-known criticism of the ap prose essays, traditional personalized notion of God: at the point at which our positive knowledge of the causal links fails, we supplement this lack with the idea of ‘God,’ which, instead of driving essay, providing a precise idea of a cause, just fills in essays education in pakistan, the lack of this idea. ( FRT , 6465). Not only is this an obscure and pretentious way of recycling a familiar post-Structuralist idea, the sentences aren’t minimally well-written. And Drinking! (I grant that “as it were” is a nice touch, as if the entire passage weren’t built on essays on co metaphors and supposition.) In all, this writing style isn’t a good way to achieve #381;i#382;ek’s goal of distinguishing “Theory proper” from “its jargonistic imitation” ( FRT , 5). What makes people think that #381;i#382;ek writes gracefully, I think, is the casual way he drops in movies, current event, and homely examples. So this: “These partial objets petit a are neither subjective nor objective, but the driving and drinking, short-circuit of the full assignment, two dimensions: the subjective stain/stand-in that sustains the order of driving and drinking essay, objectivity, and the objective ‘bone in the throat’ that sustains subjectivity” ( FRT , 65) is followed by: “Does this not provide the reason why, in so-called caper films?” ( FRT , 66). A stretch of churned mud is softened by a stream of colorful, if far-fetched, examples.

Cutely illustrating an ontological concept through mundane instances seems to make for a user-friendly approach. Homework Club Names! In every appreciation of #381;i#382;ek, there is a sentence somewhere marveling at how his vision sweeps from lofty abstraction to pop-culture examples. “He takes in subjects including national cuisines, the Cathar heresy and and drinking the literature and film of the GDR, citing Plato, Hegel, Derrida, Heidegger and more” (Monroe, “Fright of Real Theory”). But such potshot erudition is in ap prose essays, fact quite easy to achieve. Driving Essay! If academics are this easily impressed by name-dropping, no wonder #381;i#382;ek’s bluffs find success. And from this standpoint, #381;i#382;ek’s claim that correct thought moves from universal concepts to singular manifestations can be seen to ap prose essays, serve the strategic purpose of justifying his grandiloquent rhetorical leaps from the sublime to the ridiculous, from and drinking, Leninist strictures on violence to anti-smoking legislation. Finally, I’m left with the question: Why do #381;i#382;ek and MacCabe elevate a single anthology ( Post?Theory ) into ap prose essays, a movement (Post?Theory)? The book has won little attention, and no one else has built it into a mighty opposite to Lacanian theory. I can only essay, speculate. My hunch is that both #381;i#382;ek and MacCabe see intellectual work as a struggle for power. Recall their admiration for the likes of Lenin and Mao, note their rhetoric of enemies and obtuse opposition, and then observe that other passages suggest that by calling for conceptual and empirical theorizing, Post?Theory aligns itself with science. And science is a threat.

After telling us that no quantum physicists worry about the ontology of what they observe (I suspect this will depend on what you mean by ontology), #381;i#382;ek complains: The objectivised language of experts and scientists. . .can no longer be translated into the common language, available to full assignment, everyone, but is and drinking present in it in the mode of fetishized formulae that no one really understands, but which shape our artistic and popular imaginary (Black Hole, Big Bang, Superstrings, Quantum Oscillations). The gap between scientific insight and common sense is unbridgeable, and it is this very gap which elevates scientists into grudge book report, the popular cult-figures of the ‘subjects supposed to know’ (the Stephen Hawking phenomenon) ( FRT , 67). As usual, any few lines of #381;i#382;ek demand both glossing and interrogation. He starts by talking about common language, then shifts to talking about essay, common sense; but the two aren’t the same. Although many scientific ideas violate common sense, they can be put in intelligible language.

Can it really be said that science writers like Stephen Gould, Richard Dawkins, Matt Ridley, Jared Diamond, Deborah Blum, Helena Cronin, John Gribbin, and James Gleick can’t explain difficult scientific concepts to readers prepared to master thesis project description, spend a little time thinking? Moreover, given #381;i#382;ek’s tortured style, does he seem to driving, have any regard for thesis, writing in a “common language, available to everyone”? And if it’s wrong for scientists to and drinking, be elevated as “subjects supposed to know,” why isn’t the same stricture applied, say, to Freud and ap prose essays Lacan, who have become far more Delphic oracles than Einstein or Hawking? Or even applied to the “popular cult-figure” of the larger-than-life, I-am-ze-bull European intellectual who says outrageous things in order to rouse us from our bourgeois slumber? Needless to driving, say, #381;i#382;ek is strategically vague; his comments evoke attitudes, not arguments. Nor does he mention that, whatever cult value may attend to scientists in the popular press, the in pakistan, general public remains remarkably resistant to scientific findings and scientific thinking. Most Americans believe in angels and driving essay a literal place called Hell. Most accept astrology, consider the theory of evolution unfounded, and think that dinosaurs and book 13 humans lived at driving, the same time. This state of affairs, surely related to the class struggle, won’t be changed by another gloss on the concept of suture. Someone will remark that at least #381;i#382;ek loves movies. To this there’s an full assignment easy reply.

Who doesn’t? 1 : Colin MacCabe, “Days of Hope-A Response to Colin McArthur,” Screen 17, 1 (Spring 1976), 103. 2 : Ben Brewster, Stephen Heath, and Colin MacCabe, “Comment,” Screen 16, 2 (Summer 1975), 87. 3 : Thanks to Benjamin Noys for pointing this out to me. 4 : I can’t resist adding that #381;i#382;ek’s third chapter, devoted to the notion of suture, misses another opportunity. Instead of recycling confused 1960s and 1970s claims about point-of-view cutting, he could have attacked the cognitivist criticisms of suture theory that I float in Narration in the Fiction Film (Madison, 1985), 110113. 5 : Ben Brewster and Lea Jacobs, Theatre to Cinema: Stage Pictorialism and and drinking the Early Feature Film (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).

See the many discussions of 1917 releases in the book, as well as the analysis of (1919), 133-136. Full Assignment! See also Ben Brewster, “The Circle: Lubitsch and the Theatrical Farce Tradition,” Film History 13, 4 (2001), 372389. 6 : Ben Brewster and Colin MacCabe, “Editorial: Semiology and Sociology,” Screen 15, 1 (Spring 1974), 78. 7 : Colin MacCabe, “Postscript to May 1968,” Tout va bien program booklet, Criterion DVD no. 275 (2005), 20.

9 : I say idiosyncratic because #381;i#382;ek says (and he’s apparently not being playful here): “The basic rule of dialectics is thus: whenever we are offered a simple enumeration of subspecies of a universal species, we should always look for the exception to driving and drinking, the series” (27). I’m not sure that Hegel would agree that this is the full assignment, basic rule, but it’s a good research strategy. Always look out for driving essay, counterexamples to full assignment, universal claimsespecially those made by psychoanalytic theory! Remarkably, #381;i#382;ek goes on: “For example, it is my conjecture that the driving and drinking essay, key to Hitchcock’s entire opus [sic] is the film which is integral and at the same time an exception. The Trouble with Harry (1954)” (27). Ontology and grudge blue book epistemology, not argued for driving, but rather illustrated, and by a Hitchcock movie at that: such is the zigzag of the #381;i#382;ekian dialectic. 11 : All these quotations come from thesis project, Robert S. Boynton, “Enjoy Your #381;i#382;ek!” Lingua Franca 8, 7 (October 1998): 4150. 12 : Alexei Monroe, “The Fright of Real Theory,” in Kinoeye: New Perspectives on European Film , available at http:/

14 : To be fussily philosophical, if this distinction is true “by definition” it can only be a deductive truth (which it obviously isn’t) or a stipulative definition posited by the speaker. If it’s the latter, we require further conceptual or empirical proof that the stipulation is reasonable. #381;i#382;ek provides none. 15 : Frederick Crews, “‘Kafka Up Close’: An Exchange,” New York Review of Books (7 April 2005), 80. have comments about the state of this website? go here.